This article examines the widely used critical edition of Chopin’s Étude Op. 25, No. 1, analysing the editorial approach, inherent challenges, and interpretative decisions that shaped its final form. Published by the Fryderyk Chopin Institute Polish Music Publication, this edition aims to preserve Chopin’s original intentions through a careful examination of primary sources, including autographs and first editions. However, discrepancies and misleading editorial interventions raise concerns about its authenticity and reliability. This study evaluates the persuasiveness of the edition, scrutinizing the rationale behind its editorial choices and their impact on performance practice. While the edition provides valuable insights and practical guidance, it ultimately falls short of serving as a definitive, authoritative text. The discussion underscores the necessity of discerning the composer’s original intent while ensuring the credibility of the musical text. This analysis brings to light the need for performers to critically engage with editorial interpretations and recognize the significant role of edition selection in shaping artistic and interpretative decisions.
